Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Marriage of Hruby and Hruby

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1987No. TC D8111-68418; CA A38815; SC S33934PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

ORS 109.119 allows “[a]ny person * * * who has established emotional ties creating a child-parent relationship with a child” to intervene in, or to initiate, proceedings to determine child custody and related matters. The issue is whether natural parents have rights to the custody of their children that are superior to the custodial rights, if any, of persons satisfying the requirements of ORS 109.119 and, in particular, whether ORS 109.119 itself grants persons satisfying its requirements substantive custodial rights. 1 We hold that ORS 109.119 does not grant substantive custodial rights and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. McMasterOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. In Re Guardianship of WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Matter of Marriage of SleeperOregon Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API