Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Hanks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1951PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding to determine the custody of Judy Jean Bristol, infant daughter of Jean Bristol Quinn and her former husband, Jack Bristol. The proceeding was instituted by Jean Bristol Quinn, named as petitioner, against Julia A. Hanks and Carlos B. Hanks, and Nona White, as probation officer of Marion county, Oregon, named as respondents. From a decree sustaining the writ and awarding custody of said child to the petitioner, the respondents Julia A. Hanks and Carlos B. Hanks appeal.

In passing, we suggest that in habeas corpus proceedings the person applying for the writ…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffin v. GriffinOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. DeVall v. DeVallOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bartlett v. BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hurner v. HurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Garner v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Lorenz v. RoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Zipper v. ZipperOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Gage v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Godfrey v. GodfreyOregon Supreme Court · 1961

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API