People v. Fitzgerald
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
Defendant, Lawrence W. Fitzgerald, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Crim. P. 35(a) and (c) motions. We affirm.
I
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion seeking to be credited for 421 days of presentence confinement. He argues that he is entitled to this credit because his sentence in Adams County was ordered to run concurrently with his previously imposed sentence from Clear Creek County and because his confinement in Clear Creek County was attributable partially to the charges filed against him in Adams County. We disagree.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- White v. Denver District Court, Division 12Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Massey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. HickeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- William J. Hunsaker, Jr. v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. GreslColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. RoyColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. WhiteColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.