Legal Opinion

Norton v. Hudner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 27, 1913PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Tort for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff from slipping on the floor of the defendant’s market at the corner of Borden Street and Main Street in Fall River on November 15, 1907. Writ dated June 20, 1908. In the Superior Court the case was tried before Fox, J., who at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, which is described in the opinion, ordered a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The plaintiff went into the defendant’s market to buy meat and butter and, after purchasing the butter, as she turned to go to the meat counter, slipped, as she testified, upon a piece of meat covered with sawdust, and fell, receiving the injuries complained of. The floor of the market was covered with sawdust. A man was employed by the defendant whose duty it was to sweep the floor and keep it clean. He was engaged all the time in the performance of this duty. This man was dead at the time of the trial. Sawdust was sprinkled over the floor twice a day, about eight or nine in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anjou v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Goddard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Gilbert v. NagleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. White v. MugarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Hunter v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Judson v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
  5. O'Neill v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API