Norman v. Tradehome Shoe Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
These actions were for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Alice Norman in a fall in defendant’s store and for consequential damages sustained by her husband, plaintiff Paul Norman. The cases were consolidated for trial.
At the close of plaintiffs’ testimony concerning liability, they and defendant rested provisionally and by . a blended motion, defendant moved for a directed verdict or dismissal on the grounds that plaintiffs had failed to prove any actionable negligence on its part. The trial court granted the motion for a directed verdict, ruling that plaintiffs had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Albachten v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Ober v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Hubbard v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sheehan v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Edwards v. Hy-VeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Rua Do Chui Le, Husband and Wife v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Wolvert v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Carter v. Western Union Telegraph CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.