Legal Opinion

Karbelnig v. Brothwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1966No. Civ. 28735PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in an action seeking declaratory relief.

’■ The plaintiffs were doing business under the fictitious name and style of Medi-Sanco and were the successors in interest and assignees of a general partnership doing business under the fictitious name and style of Developments Unlimited.

On December 28, 1960, the plaintiffs’ assignor, hereinafter referred to as' the lessor, entered into a written lease contract With the defendants Lester Leroy Brothwell and Ruth Y. Brothwell, hereinafter referred to as the lessees, for the rental of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffman Wall Paper Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Vintaloro v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Tolle v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Weintraub v. WeingartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  3. Philpot v. BouchelleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Hersch v. Citizens Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API