Karbelnig v. Brothwell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in an action seeking declaratory relief.
’■ The plaintiffs were doing business under the fictitious name and style of Medi-Sanco and were the successors in interest and assignees of a general partnership doing business under the fictitious name and style of Developments Unlimited.
On December 28, 1960, the plaintiffs’ assignor, hereinafter referred to as' the lessor, entered into a written lease contract With the defendants Lester Leroy Brothwell and Ruth Y. Brothwell, hereinafter referred to as the lessees, for the rental of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hoffman Wall Paper Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Vintaloro v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Tolle v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Weintraub v. WeingartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Philpot v. BouchelleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Hersch v. Citizens Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.