Legal Opinion

Mead & Phillips Drilling Co. v. Rush

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1932No. 28164PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

On March 9, 1931, the respondent, W. W. Rush, while in the employ of Mead & Phillips Drilling Company, received an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. The injury occurred in the following manner: The respondent herein and others were running a string of pipe and started to turn the pipe lire full of water and respondent picked up a hose and was running whter in the pipe and the driller, instead of turning on the water, by mistake turned the steam on and this blew the hose out and hit respondent on the head and scalded him to some extent and knocked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith & McDannald v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Western Steel Erecting Co. v. LukenbillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Gudgel v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Briscoe Const. Co. v. ListermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Sparkman v. Cosden Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. National Well Service v. BrumleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Mayo Hotel Co. v. BarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API