Legal Opinion
Gudgel v. State Industrial Com.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 28, 1931No. 21615PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission awarding respondent Walton compensation on account of permanent partial loss of the use of the left foot and permanent partial loss of the use of the great toe of the right foot, also allowing for temporary total disability from the date of the injury, September 26, 1929, to the date of the hearing before the Commission, June 24, 1930.
No complaint is made of the award for permanent partial loss of the left foot and the great toe of the right foot.
It is contended that there is no competent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Smith & McDannald v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Western Steel Erecting Co. v. LukenbillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Consolidated School Dist. No. 8 v. WilderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Briscoe Const. Co. v. ListermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Sparkman v. Cosden Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Mead & Phillips Drilling Co. v. RushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Mayo Hotel Co. v. BarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- United States Gypsum Co. v. ReamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939