Legal Opinion

Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1942No. 8 Div. 182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals in the opinion reviewed here on certiorari, 7 So.2d 319, 1 dismissed the: appeal on the ground, not that the appellant was guilty of negligence in prosecuting the appeal but that said court •did not obtain jurisdiction of the appellee’s person by the issuance and service of a •citation of appeal before the motion to dismiss was made, and stresses the default of the clerk in failing to issue the certificate •and citation of appeal.

The duty of the appellant to diligently prosecute his appeal, by causing the necessary steps to be taken to perfect the appeal, •or show cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stiles v. H. H. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Faust v. BakerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Clower v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API