Legal Opinion

Faust v. Baker

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1944No. 4 Div. 774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

This appeal was submitted on “Motion and Merits.” The “motion” is one, duly filed, to dismiss the appeal, based on two grounds: One, that no citation of appeal was issued to and served on appellee in accordance with Code 1940, Title 7, Section 801; and, two, that the transcript of the proceedings below was not filed in this court within the time prescribed by Code 1940, Title 7, Section 769, or by Supreme Court Rule 41, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix.

As for the second of the above grounds, the provisions of Code 1940, Title 7, Section 770, are, among other things, that “the appellate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co. v. HouppertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Feibelman v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Foster v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Maya Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benson-Jackson-Mathers Post No. 5106 v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Estate of Autry v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Faust v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API