Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the appeal cannot be sustained. It was taken within the time provided and allowed by the statute so far as appears from the record. It is true the notice or citation was not served for several months afterwards, but this irregularity affected only the question as to when the appeal should stand for trial, and not the jurisdictional validity of the appeal itself, which became complete when it was prayed for and the requisite security given. Willingham v. Harrell, 34 Ala. 680; Moore v. Spier, 80 Ala. 129; Kimbrell v. Rogers, 90…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kimbrell v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Moore v. SpierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Willingham v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
3Cited by8 opinions
- Benson-Jackson-Mathers Post No. 5106 v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- SOUTHERN GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Reiss v. ReissCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Stiles v. H. H. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Blalock v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.