Legal Opinion

Stiles v. H. H. Lambert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 4, 1957No. 5 Div. 667PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

As we interpret the opinion of the Court of Appeals, based on the assignment of error which that court reviewed, the court reached a conclusion of fact. Since this appears to be true, this court will not review the finding of the Court of Appeals.

In Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne, 242 Ala. 589, 7 So.2d 319, 320, this court said:

“The case is here again on certiorari to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals affirming the order of the circuit court granting the plaintiff’s *185motion for new trial, on grounds among others that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Richardson v. MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Stokes Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Jones Valley Finance Co. v. TennilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Pruett v. State ex rel. Colbert CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Roberson v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API