Legal Opinion

Ross v. Auto Club Group

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2008No. Docket 130917PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This case arises out of a dispute over no-fault benefits. Plaintiff Randall Ross was injured in an automobile accident and submitted a claim for work-loss benefits to defendant Auto Club Group, his no-fault insurer. Defendant denied plaintiffs claim, prompting him to file this lawsuit. The trial court not only awarded plaintiff benefits, but also awarded attorney fees. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

We granted defendant’s application for leave to appeal. We hold that the trial court properly awarded plaintiff work-loss benefits. But it clearly erred when deciding that defendant’s refusal to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. KitchenMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. BarbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Attard v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Sweebe v. SweebeMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Manuel v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Douglas v. Allstate Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Moore v. Secura InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Abdul Nahshal v. Fremont Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API