Legal Opinion

Manuel v. Gill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2008No. Docket 131103PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

At issue in this case is (1) whether defendant Tri-County Metro Narcotics Squad (TCM) has standing to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeals despite prevailing on every issue in that Court, (2) if so, whether TCM is a juridical entity subject to suit, and (3) whether TCM is a “state agency” that may only be sued in the Court of Claims. We conclude that, because TCM was aggrieved by the Court of Appeals decision, which permitted plaintiffs to bring a subsequent suit on the same grounds in a different court, TCM has standing to appeal that decision. We further conclude that TCM is a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Joseph Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Bank of America Na v. First American Title Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. S. Dearborn Envtl. Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. QualityMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Hughes v. Almena TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Berry v. GarrettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API