Legal Opinion

North Chicago St. R. v. Chicago Union Traction Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided December 17, 1906No. Nos. 27,508, 27,509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Motion to compel complainants to attach exhibit to bills, and right of answering defendants to plead, answer, or demur by reason of joining of John B. Parsons by amendment.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

These ancillary bills are brought by the North Chicago and West Chicago Companies and their stockholders to enforce causes of action belonging to the receivers of said companies, which the receivers decline to prosecute; they being made defendants. The main purpose of the suits is to redress the alleged fraud of the late Charles T. Yerkes, who, as president and managing director *614of'the North and West Companies, is charged to have built suburban street railways with the funds and upon the credit of said companies, and v^ith taking to himself and certain of his…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States Ex Rel. International Contracting Co. v. LamontSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1915
  2. Noble v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Seminole Securities Co. v. Southern Life Ins.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1910
  4. Moxie Co. v. DaoustDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1912
  5. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API