Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 15, 1915No. 54PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Oscar D. Johnson against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company to cancel a relief. On motion to dismiss the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The bill, after stating jurisdictional facts, alleges in substance that plaintiff was injured through defend*197ant’s negligence while in its employ, March 5, 1910; was treated by defendant’s physicians, and after three weeks discharged as practically well; that further disorder developed because of the injury, and plaintiff was thereafter treated and operated upon by defendant’s physicians; that after the operation he experienced new symptoms of disease, which are described in detail; that on or about April 29, 1912, at the instance and request of defendant, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  2. Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Thackrah v. HaasSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Hill v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  5. Newberry v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rosane v. SengerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Bonici v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Weathers v. Kansas City Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Ladd v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. The Ss StandardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API