Legal Opinion

Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 14, 1932No. Nos. 4543-4545PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

The three appeals, which were consolidated by order of the court, present identical questions. As holders of Certificates Series One, appellants, individually and for others similarly situated, intervened in the pending suit, which was brought to liquidate the property of the Chicago Railways Company. The original suit was instituted by a creditor. Following closely was a foreclosure suit begun by a trustee of one of the outstanding mortgages executed by said railways company. Receivers were appointed, the two suits were consolidated, and the status of the various…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Babcock v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. Chicago Rys. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
  4. In Re BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  5. Thatcher v. Chicago Rys. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API