Legal Opinion

Moxie Co. v. Daoust

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided June 22, 1912No. 380PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Moxie Company against Daniel Daoust.

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

In this case the complainant asks for an injunction upon the ground that the defendant is engaged in unfair competition.

The complainant, through extensive advertising, has built up a very considerable reputation for the beverage known- as Moxie, and it is claimed that their transparent glass bottle, of a novel and distinctive shape, is such that the consuming public recognizes the bottle, in which the color of the contents is shown, and that the defendant’s bottle and the color of the beverage are so like the complainant’s in visual appearance that the purchasing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. OgilvieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  3. North Chicago St. R. v. Chicago Union Traction Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1906
  4. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. Worcester Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. RobitailleDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1976
  2. Moxie Co. v. BagoianDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API