Legal Opinion

State v. Youngstown Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 4, 1929No. 6 Div. 235PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit by the state was to. collect tonnage tax having accrued and due by the Youngstown Mining Company for the years of 1924, 1925, and 1926. The sums sought to be recovered were per Schedule 66, § 361, of the Revenue Code of 1919 (Laws-1919, p. 282), for the respective years indicated in the several counts.

The suit or bill in this cause was filed on May 14, 1927, at which time A. A. Fendley was the duly appointed and acting receiver of said mining company, and in such official capacity was in possession of its properties’ and operating the same, and in his representative and not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Grider v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Vanderbilt v. EidmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Clapp v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Trippet v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Alabama Educational FoundationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Pickett v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Watkins v. ReinhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Burt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API