Pickett v. Richardson

There was nonsuit for the sustaining of demurrer to the complaint.

It is true that for good reason, under the statute, only a bonded executive officer as authorized by the statute has authority to discharge the extraordinary duty of levying an attachment under section 6195, Code, and not a special constable who is authorized to be appointed for general service under sections 6801, 8705, Code. Carter Brothers & Co. v. Ellis, Thomas & Hill, 90 Ala. 138, 7 So. 531; Peebles v. Weir, 60 Ala. 413.

When amended count A is analyzed, it charges: (1) That a writ of attachment duly issued from and by W.…