Legal Opinion

Novosad v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 27, 1994No. 04-93-00375-CVPublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Janice Novosad sued Mid-Century Insurance Company of Texas (Mid-Century), under the uninsured/underinsured provisions of her automobile insurance policy for personal injuries sustained when Novosad was involved in an accident with a third party. Mid-Century stipulated to the negligence of the underinsured third party prior to the presentation of any evidence to the jury. By virtue of this stipulation, the only issues presented at trial were the nature and extent of Novosad’s injuries and the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by Novosad. Among other damages, Novosad…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jones v. Tarrant Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Brainard v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Grapevine Excavation v. Maryland LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. American Interstate Insurance Co. v. Hinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  4. Texas Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Southwest Aggregates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  5. Southwest Texas Coors, Inc. v. Morales, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API