American Interstate Insurance Co. v. Hinson
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
Is the evidence in this workers’ compensation case sufficient to support the jury’s finding that William E. Hinson was not intoxicated at the time of his injury? We review all of the evidence admitted at the trial to evaluate if the jury’s verdict should be affirmed.1
HINSON’S EVIDENCE REGARDING INTOXICATION
While employed by Constructors and Erectors (C & E) and working with fellow employees as a steel connector on a raising gang at the Abitibi paper mill in Lufkin, Texas, Hinson fell from a steel structure. Hinson had approximately four or five years of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Royce Homes, L.P. v. Humphrey, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
- Hunter v. FORD MOTOR CO., INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
- Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Morris, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- McClung v. Ayers, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Yolanda Jaime Berrelez v. Mesquite Logistics USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.