Legal Opinion
United States v. Certain Land Situated
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 8, 2006No. 04-1052PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal represents the culmination of a protracted condemnation proceeding the length of which calls Dickens’ Bleak House to mind. Detroit International Bridge Company (“DIBCO”) appeals from a jury verdict that determined the value of two parcels of land owned by the company and located near the Ambassador Bridge, which connects Detroit to Windsor, Canada. In 1979, the General Services Administration (“GSA”), acting on behalf of the Customs Service, initiated a condemnation action. The crux of this appeal involves a dispute over the proper method of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Louis Schneider v. County of San Diego, and Reybro, Inc., a California Corporation, Dba, Quality Auto RecyclingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. 50.50 Acres of Land, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Certain Land Situated In The City Of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009