Legal Opinion

Leverett v. Continental Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 92, Calendar No. 34,247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

George Leverett and his son, George Clark Leverett, were section men on the Michigan Central- Railroad, near Kalamazoo. Each had an accident insurance policy with defendant, the father’s taken in September, 1925, with premium of $2.65 per month, and the son’s in May, 1926, with monthly premium of $2.95. As part of the contract, each gave an order to the railroad paymaster to deduct the premiums from his wages for one year and thereafter until insured should notify the insurer in writing to discontinue the policy. Each month defendant sent the paymaster a list of premiums to be deducted from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lyon v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Johnson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. Cotten v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Carey Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Chayer v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API