Legal Opinion

Cotten v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi

Decided January 17, 1890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

At Law. Action on insurance policy.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, Mrs. Theresa Cotten, against the defendant corporation, to recover the sum of §3,000, with interest, alleged to be due upon an accident insurance policy, issued to William M. Cotten, the son of tho plaintiff, for her benefit in case of his death from accidental causes.

Tho questions now for decision arise: (1) Upon defendant’s motion for leave to file two additional pleas to plaintiff’s declaration; (2) upon defendant’s motion for a peremptory instruction to the jury to return a verdict for it; and (3) on the plaintiff’s motion for a peremptory…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Routzahn v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  2. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Corporation v. RubinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Lynchburg Cotton Mill Co. v. Travelers' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API