Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 1945No. Nos. 187, 210PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Judge.
These two cases present a common question : Whether the Price Administrator has authority to issue a maximum price regulation applicable to sales of intoxicating liquors in the state of Mississippi. Complainants in both cases have been indicted for selling liquor above the maximum prices established by Maximum Price Regulation No. 445. Spiers filed a petition with this Court to vacate the Administrator’s order of denial of his protest, challenging the validity of the regulation in question. The Barnett complainants, after their indictments, arraignments and pleas, filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gillespie-Rogers-Pyatt Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Lincoln Sav. Bank v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Jatros v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miguel A. Moreno Rios v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Collins v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- United States v. STATE TAX COM'N OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPIDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1972
- United States v. EricsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- Darling & Co. v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.