Legal Opinion
United Steelworkers of America v. Rohm & Haas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 14, 2008No. 06-4346PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior United States District Judge.
In this case we are asked to review a determination by the District Court that an employee’s challenge to a denial of disability benefits under a plan adopted by an employer pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., is subject to the grievance procedure, including arbitration, contained in a separate collective bargaining agreement (the “CBA”) negotiated between the employer and its workers under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. While we recognize the strong policy…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Houston Refining, L.P. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, ManufacturingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Ronald Cup v. Ampco Pittsburgh CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1776Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Karl Schmidt Unisia, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers, UAW Local 2357Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.