Legal Opinion

State v. McLean

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1993No. C-920494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

The defendant-appellant, Thomas McLean, appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault. In his single assignment of error he contends that the sentencing court’s order requiring him to repay his court-appointed attorney fees as a condition of probation was improper for two reasons: (1) it violated the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and (2) it exceeded the scope of a valid condition of probation. The assignment of error is not well taken.

McLean was indicted for felonious assault. He negotiated a plea agreement with the state and entered a guilty plea to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. TymcioOhio Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. TremblyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. GlasureOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. SpringsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API