Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1990No. 88-370PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Per curiam

The single issue presented for our review is whether this trial court under the instant circumstances abused its discretion in imposing as a condition of probation that this defendant “have no association or communication, direct or indirect, with anyone under the age of eighteen (18) years not a member of his immediate family.” For the reasons which follow, we find that the trial court did have authority to limit the probationer’s associations with minors, and as reasonably interpreted did not abuse its discretion imposing such a condition on probation.

Pursuant to R.C. 2951.02, the trial…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Berra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Charles Farrell Malone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. State v. TaltyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BraxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. BowserOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. IntiharOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API