Legal Opinion

State v. Tymcio

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1975No. 74-456PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.

The trial court’s initial factual determination of nonindigency was fairly made. At that time, the defendant was regularly employed, had been freed on bond, and was scheduled to appear for trial. He knew that by reason of the court’s determination of his nonindigency, he was obliged to seek counsel at his own expense. With the resources at his disposal, the defendant appeared able to make some reasonable arrangement for adequate representation.

When the defendant appeared in court 31 days later, he reported that he had been unable to obtain counsel, that *43he was unrepresented, and that he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. GlasureOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. HaagOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Tymcio v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. McLeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API