Legal Opinion

Blake v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1938No. 27148. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— During the summer and fall of 1935, the city of Seattle was engaged in construction work, including some road building, in Whatcom and Skagit counties, all in connection with the Skagit river hydroelectric project. In the course of the carrying out of the plan, a road was being constructed near Ruby camp, in the vicinity of Diablo. This road was being built pursuant to plans and specifications prepared by engineers in the employ of the city of Seattle, and an employee of the city was in charge of the operation. The building of the road was part of the development of the Ruby basin, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garney v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Brooks v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Reid v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Laws v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Fitzgerald v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olivieri v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Hendershot v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Scott v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Pasquarello v. Charles E. Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  5. Clausen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API