Legal Opinion

Brooks v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1938No. 26827. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

In this action, the plaintiff, as admin-istratrix, sues to recover damages from the city of Seattle on account of the death of her husband, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the city.

The complaint states that the city was the owner, and engaged in the erection, of a bridge across Cedar river, at or near the town of Cedar Falls, in King county; that, on March 19, 1934, in the course of construction, one of the bents, on which the decedent was working, collapsed, throwing him to the river bed below and causing his death.

It is alleged that the accident resulted from the negligent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hines v. DahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Hoover v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. Whitney v. SprattWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Dixie MacHinery & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Oklahoma City v. CapleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Walter v. Everett School District No. 24Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. City of Waco v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API