State v. Viramontes
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Samuel Viramontes was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to a prison term of natural life. On appeal, he claims the trial court erred by failing to apply the special sentencing procedures in A.R.S. § 13-703 to determine whether to impose natural life or a life sentence with the possibility of release in twenty-five years, and by considering natural life the presumptive sentence for first-degree murder. 1 Finding no reversible error, we affirm. But because the trial court stated in its sentencing minute entry that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ViramontesArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State of Arizona v. Samuel Phillip ViramontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State of Arizona v. Hon. Howard Fell Edward John SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. ViramontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004