Legal Opinion

State v. Viramontes

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 19, 2001No. 2 CA-CR 00-0227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Samuel Viramontes was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to a prison term of natural life. On appeal, he claims the trial court erred by failing to apply the special sentencing procedures in A.R.S. § 13-703 to determine whether to impose natural life or a life sentence with the possibility of release in twenty-five years, and by considering natural life the presumptive sentence for first-degree murder. 1 Finding no reversible error, we affirm. But because the trial court stated in its sentencing minute entry that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ViramontesArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. State of Arizona v. Samuel Phillip ViramontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State of Arizona v. Hon. Howard Fell Edward John SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. State v. ViramontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API