Legal Opinion
Caldwell v. Enstrom Helicopter Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2000No. 99-15746PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAJBER, Circuit Judge:
In this case, we are asked to decide whether a revised flight manual is a new “system ... or other part” of a helicopter within the meaning of the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 19941 (“GARA”). Our answer is “yes.” Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the district court and remand the case for further proceedings.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Because the district court dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), we take all allegations of material fact as true and construe the com*1156plaint in the light most favorable to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monterey Plaza Hotel Limited Partnership v. Local 483 of the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Order and Employees Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Newman & Holtzinger, P.C. Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust, Law CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Burroughs v. Precision Airmotive Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Alter v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Colgan Air, Inc. v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Lyon v. Agusta, S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Larry Crouch v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.