Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Newman & Holtzinger, P.C. Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust, Law Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1993No. 91-56533PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its action for breach of and tortious interference with an alleged agreement entered into during an underlying federal action. Westinghouse originally brought its action in California state court against three law firms, two of which — Newman & Holt-zinger, P.C. (N & H) and Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust (Chase) — represented parties to the underlying federal action and were alleged to be parties to the agreement. The third law firm, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge (Shaw),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Smith & Fuller, P.A. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Pacheco De Perez v. AT&T Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- MSR Exploration, Ltd. v. Meridian Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Texas v. Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.