Legal Opinion

Ciski v. Wentworth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1930No. 22172PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The journal entry of the Court of Appeals does not disclose upon what ground that court based the decree granting to the plaintiffs below the easement in question. The petition prayed for the injunction upon two grounds: First, a prescriptive right, and, second, an easement by implication, passing as an appurtenance under the conveyance of plaintiffs and those under whom they claimed.

The rights of these plaintiffs in this 12-foot strip we think arise by implication from the conveyances made to their predecessors in title from the common owner, and in turn transmitted to the plaintiffs as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Manbeck v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Frate v. RimenikOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Cannon v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  5. Zell v. Universalist SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Tiller v. HintonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Trattar v. RauschOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Cadwallader v. ScovannerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Dunn v. RansomOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Renner v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API