Legal Opinion

Matter of Heaney v. McGoldrick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1941PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lehman, Ch. J;

The petitioner, Thomas A. Heaney, Jr., is employed on its public works by the city of New York, Department of Sanitation, under the civil service title of licensed fireman. The budget of the city provides for the appropriation of lump sums to be paid to a specified number of employees holding positions under that title, “ at the prevailing rates.” The rates of pay which these employees actually receive is seven dollars for an eight-hour day, or approximately eighty-seven and one-half cents per hour. The petitioner, claiming that this pay is less “ than the prevailing rate for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Newbrand v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. New York Water Service Corp. v. Water Power & Control CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Austin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Matter of Gaston v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Simpson v. WolanskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Baltimore Building & Construction Trades Council v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Erdman v. IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. Matter of LongNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API