Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Wolansky
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1975PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCooke, J.
Petitioner Carlisle Simpson, a permanent employee of the Department of Mental Hygiene serving as a ward aide at Letchworth Village,1 was charged with miscon*393duct in allegedly having engaged in sexual intercourse on two occasions with a resident at said school for the mentally retarded.
Respondent, the Director of Letchworth, designated Barbara Barish, the Personnel Officer of the Manhattan State Hospital, to act as hearing officer. Following the hearing, Ms. Barish made certain findings, concluded that petitioner was innocent of the charge, and recommended reinstatement. Respondent however…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten EyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Newbrand v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Wignall v. FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Economico v. Village of PelhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Wiggins v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Leventhal v. KnapekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Bigelow v. Board of Trustees of GouverneurNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.