Legal Opinion

Suydam v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1998No. S-7683PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

At issue in this appeal is the decision of the Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission denying Antril C. Suydam’s application for a Prince William Sound herring purse seine entry permit. Under the- Alaska Limited Entry Act (Act), AS 16.43.010 et seq., permit applicants are ranked under a point system according to their economic dependence upon and past participation in the fishery. See 20 Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) 05.600 (1997). In this case, substantial evidence supported the Commission’s finding that Suydam was not domiciled in Kodiak in 1976,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mulford v. Walnut Hill Farm Group, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  2. Finney v. HoweyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  3. Widmyer v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API