Legal Opinion
Gurren v. Casperson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1928No. 20901. Department OnePublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
The defendants Casperson owned and operated the Commodore Hotel in Seattle, Washington. They had the usual employees of hotels of the size of this, consisting of a day and night clerk, bell boys, switch board operator, etc. The plaintiff occupied a room in the hotel, and in her complaint alleges that she was a guest of the hotel, and this allegation is admitted by the answer of the defendants.
On the evening of September 11, 1926, the plaintiff returned to the hotel at about 11:30 p. m., and went to her room. Very shortly thereafter the defendant Sullivan entered plaintiff’s room, and it at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rommel v. SchambacherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Curran v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Bruner v. Seelbach Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Chase v. KnabelWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Molloy v. ColettiNew York Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Nivens v. CornerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nivens v. 7-11 Hoagy's CornerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Thetford v. City of ClantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Tae Kim v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.