Curran v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of tbe district court for Polk county, Watts, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while in the saloon of the defendants, by reason of their alleged negligence in failing to protect him from an assault by a vicious and lawless person whom they permitted to be in and about their saloon. The answer was a denial. Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $100, and the defendants appealed from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
The question presented by the record is whether the verdict is sustained by the evidence. The defendants claim that it is not, because the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mastad v. BrethrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Kelly v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- De Wolf v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.