Legal Opinion

Nivens v. 7-11 Hoagy's Corner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1997No. 64512-4PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

943 P.2d 286 (1997)

133 Wash.2d 192

Ken NIVENS, Appellant,

v.

7-11 HOAGY'S CORNER; and Southland Corporation, Respondent.

No. 64512-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 21, 1997.

Decided September 11, 1997.

As Amended October 1, 1997.

Samuel H. Pemberton, Jr., Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Bonneville, Viert, Morton & McGoldrick by John C. Moore, Tacoma, for Respondent.

TALMADGE, Justice.

We must decide if a business owes a duty to its invitees to protect them from criminal acts by third persons on the business premises. Because a business has a special relationship with them, it has a duty to…

Also in this document: Dissent · Sanders; Dissent · Sanders; Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Washburn ex rel. Estate of Roznowski v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2013

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API