Nivens v. Corner
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.
— We must decide if a business owes a duty to its invitees to protect them from criminal acts by third persons on the business premises. Because a business has a special relationship with them, it has a duty to take reasonable steps to protect invitees from imminent criminal harm or reasonably foreseeable criminal conduct by third persons.
Appellant Nivens also asks us to decide if a business owes a distinct duty to invitees to retain security personnel to prevent criminal acts by third parties. Because we believe such a duty would impermissibly shift responsibility from government to private…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.