Legal Opinion

Washington v. Courtesy Motor Sales, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1964No. Gen. 49,332PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE MURPHY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action of fraud and deceit. The trial court struck the amended complaint and dismissed the action as to defendant Ford Motor Company, on the ground that the amended complaint, as to Ford, was “substantially insufficient in law.” Plaintiff appeals.

In substance, the fraud alleged is that while plaintiff negotiated and paid for a new car, the automobile which was delivered to her had been previously used, and its speedometer had been set back. Charging fraud and deceit in the sale, plaintiff seeks damages totaling $50,018…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Evanston v. PiotrowiczIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Reynolds v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Burkhalter v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Garofalo Co. v. St. Mary's Packing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Westerdale v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Theos & Sons, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Rhodes Pharmacal Co. v. Continental Can Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Spiegel v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Arnson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API