Legal Opinion

Rhodes Pharmacal Co. v. Continental Can Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1966No. Gen. 50,825PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

This is an alleged breach of implied warranty case. Plaintiff, Rhodes Pharmacal Company, Inc., is in' the business of marketing various drug, cosmetic and hair beauty products. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages which resulted from leakage of aerosol cans purchased by plaintiff from defendant, Pittsburgh Railways Company, and manufactured by defendant, Continental Can Company, Inc. No personal injury is involved.

Plaintiff filed a 3-count amended complaint. Count II was directed against Continental Can, as manufacturer of the defective cans. The trial court granted the motion of Continental…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. ParrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API