Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Skelly Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1939No. 44900PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Eight separate grounds of negligence are charged in the petition as follows: (1) That the said Jay Watson was negligent in that he knew the place in which he asked the plaintiff to stand when he was fixing the tire was not a safe place to stand while doing such heavy pounding; (2) that the defendant knew the plaintiff herein was in close proximity and should have known that to strike with such force with the plaintiff so near to the tire was careless, reckless and jeopardizing the safety of his customer; (3) that the defendant knew that the hammer which he was using was old and brittle and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Titus v. Bradford etc. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, McKean County1890
  2. Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Mallinger v. Webster City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Norton v. Day Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Humpton v. P. F. Unterkircher & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Stenlund v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  3. Texas Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Stephens v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Shaffer v. MaierOhio Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API