Legal Opinion
Boehm v. City of Vancouver
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 10, 2002No. 27395-1-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
47 P.3d 137 (2002)
111 Wash.App. 711
Alvin V. BOEHM and Janice M. Brown-Boehm, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF VANCOUVER, Washington, a municipal corporation, Respondent, and
Roundup Co., Inc., dba Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., Intervenor/Respondent.
No. 27395-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
May 10, 2002.
Mark Erikson, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, Counsel for Appellants.
James J. McNamara, Asst. City Attorney, Timothy McMahan, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, Ramona Monroe, Attorney at Law, Seattle, Counsel for Respondents.
BRIDGEWATER, J.
Alvin Boehm and Janice Brown Boehm (the Boehms)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lanzce G. Douglass, Inc. v. City of Spokane ValleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Gebbers v. Okanogan County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- City of Medina v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- City of Medina v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Gebbers v. OKANOGAN CTY. PUBLIC UTIL. DIST.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.