Legal Opinion

Boehm v. City of Vancouver

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 10, 2002No. 27395-1-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

Alvin Boehm and Janice Brown-Boehm (the Boehms) appeal from a superior court judgment that affirmed the City of Vancouver hearing examiner’s approval of a preliminary site plan and conditional use permit for Fred Meyer’s proposed gas station. We hold that neither the hearing examiner nor the superior court erred in holding that the Boehms failed to properly appeal the concurrency decision. Our review then is properly of the State Environ*714mental Policy Act (SEPA) decision. Further, we hold that SEPA review need not address cumulative impacts when speculative, and that when the Boehms can point…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boehm v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Lanzce G. Douglass, Inc. v. City of Spokane ValleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Gebbers v. Okanogan County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. City of Medina v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. City of Medina v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API