Boelter v. Hilton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
At the close of the evidence the defendant bank moved for a directed verdict in its favor, which motion was granted, and no question is raised by either party as to the correctness of that ruling.
*4It appears, stating the facts most strongly in favor of the plaintiff, that the defendant Hilton is cashier of the National Manufacturers Bank, in which the owner, Verbeck, was a depositor; that the bank customarily accepted payment of rent and passed the same to Verbeck’s account; that prior to the 30th of September, 1925, the key to the Verbeck place had been left at the bank. It further appears…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haupt v. VintWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Oliver v. MorawetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Fredendall v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Wisconsin Farm Co. v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hansche v. A. J. Conroy, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Mattice v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Commonwealth Telephone Co. v. PaleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Sell v. General Electric Supply Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- RISDON, INC. v. Miller Distributing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966