Haupt v. Vint
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Pocahontas County. Action by J. C. Ilaupt against W. H. Yint, the De Ean Lumber Compairy, and others. Judgment lor plaintiff, and defendant lumber company brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
PORRENBARGER, JUDGE :
The purpose of this writ of error is to test the soundness of a judgment on a negotiable note, in favor of the payee and against the maker thereof and an endorser.
The consideration of the note was a team of horses, purchased by the maker thereof, W. H. Yint. Before delivery of the note to the payee, the name of The DeKan Lumber Company was written on the back thereof. Plaupt, the payee, then wrote his name on the back of it above that of the lumber company and discounted it at a certain bank. It was renewed some two or three times in the original form, and, having been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. . MadisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Ballou v. TalbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- Rey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Burton & Co. v. HansfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Young v. SehonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Willingham, Wright & Covington v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Carroll-Cross Coal Co. v. Abrams Creek Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Davis v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Sorenson v. KribsOregon Supreme Court · 1916
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.